Like the Intel Pentium brand, Athlon has branded several AMD processors, including the Athlon XP, Athlon X2 and Athlon 64. The AMD Duron. Intel announced that multi-core Pentium M processors would take over for the P4, whose scalability is running out. Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 Conroe 2.66GHz LGA 775 Processor. EQUALS. 4. 2005: Athlon 64 X2 (AMD) First dual-core 64 bit desktop processor. 4. Even the Athlon 64 X2 3800+, the lowest end of AMD's dual-core CPUs, is … These features, as well as an IPC (instructions per cycle) number, determine how well a processor performs. Higher clock speed. Intel was on the back peddle. More threads. 2 MB. Litigation Information in this table was retrieved from actual processors using CPUID instruction, and we also utilized internal timer to measure CPU frequency. The cheapest of these is around $200, highest at $1000. Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 Kentsfield 2.66GHz LGA 775. Based on 14,846 user benchmarks for the AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ and the Intel Core2 Duo E6550, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,281 CPUs. 64-bit Intel Xeon 2.83 GHz . The table below compares support for x86 extensions and technologies, as well as individual instructions and low-level features of the AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-62 and Intel Pentium T3400 microprocessors. 64-bit Intel Xeon 3.00D GHz . ... About Diffen How to Cite Log in / Register Request a Comparison Submit Feedback. At every turn, AMD beat it to the punch. 3.1 GHz. 1 MB/core. 64-bit Intel Xeon 2.80D GHz . In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Athlon 64 3200+ is noticeably better than the Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz when it comes to running the latest games. Much newer manufacturing process. Though technically "inferior" (on paper) to their Intel counterparts, these processors offer consumers the same, if not better performance, through a few technological differences. It is a dual-core CPU running at 2.6 GHz & 64 bits. Stay connected The graphs below compare the most important characteristics of the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (76W) and Intel E7400 CPUs. VS. older Released May, 2006. More cores. AMD Athlon 64 FX 62 . 22 nm. 2004: Athlon XP-M (AMD) Low-power version of the Athlon XP processor, the slowest (2700+) part draws 35W with 512kB L2 cache. However, it was AMD that made a massive breakthrough by developing 64-bit for its Athlon series of processors, hence the branding AMD64 (later x86-64). In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+ is noticeably better than the Intel Celeron J1800 2.41GHz when it comes to running the latest games. AMD's groundbreaking technology utilized a dual front side bus, even though the raw processing speed (or MHz rating) was the same as Intel's Pentium 3 or Celeron processors. Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 3350P. 2.8 GHz; Dual core; Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon 64 FX 62. Intel should be embarrassed with its showing in round 2. AMD became a success story with the Athlon processor and, like Intel, began producing a lower cost processor -- the AMD Duron -- which also had less cache. Much more l2 cache. ... AMD Athlon 64 3000+ AMD Athlon 64 X2 3400+ Dual-Core AMD Opteron 1210 EE . Much more l2 cache per core. Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 Conroe 2.66GHz LGA 775 Processor.